Viktor Gyökeres has defended players seeking transfers, insisting clubs still hold overwhelming power in negotiations, despite his own aggressive tactics to secure a summer move to Arsenal.
Clubs Can Do What They Want” – Gyökeres Defends Player Power in Modern Transfers
The Swedish striker went on strike at Sporting CP, refusing to attend pre-season training to force through his £55.5 million transfer.
This resulted in a hefty fine of approximately €350,000 for his 13-day absence. Yet, when asked about the growing trend of players influencing moves, Gyökeres argued the balance of power remains firmly with clubs.
“It can be the same that you don’t really know what’s been going on behind [the scenes],” Gyökeres told The Sun, referencing the saga of his international teammate Alexander Isak.
“I don’t really know in his case what the situation has been exactly… He doesn’t have any power; clubs can do what they want with a player. It’s difficult, but it’s how the situation is.”
His comments come after Isak’s own determined efforts to leave Newcastle United.
Isak effectively went on strike, missing pre-season and the club’s first three Premier League games to secure a British record £125 million move to Liverpool on deadline day.
Gyökeres acknowledged the difficulty of such situations but emphasized the challenging position players often face.
While his actions at Sporting ultimately succeeded, the club’s president, Frederico Varandas, initially took a hard line, vowing to fine him and hold him to his contract.
Both transfers highlight the intense pressure players can apply to get their desired moves, yet Gyökeres believes the system ultimately favours the clubs.
His experience underlines the complex and high-stakes nature of modern football negotiations, where players seek control over their careers but institutions still wield significant authority.
